Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00631
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pulido-Sanchez, et al. v. Bondi
as 25-5898
Petitioner:
CECILIA PULIDO-SANCHEZ, JAVIER CARDENAS-PULIDO and E. C.-P.
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Javier Cardenas, et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation, et al
as 23-11183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAVIER CARDENAS and RODNEY BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Toyota Motor Corporation, et al., et al v. Javier Cardenas, et al
as 21-90032
Petitioner:
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES CORPORATION, U.S.A., INC., TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING, INC. and others
Respondent:
JAVIER CARDENAS and RODNEY BAKER
USA v. Cardenas-Ramos
as 21-10370
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Javier Cardenas-Ramos
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
CARDENAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00535
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAVIER CARDENAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03248
Plaintiff:
ANDY KEETON, CHRISTOPHER TURNER, ALLEN JOHNS and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HALL et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03065
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CHRASTKA, KEITH PETTY, EUGENE ROBERSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johns et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02221
Plaintiff:
Andy Keeton, Christopher Turner, Allen Johns and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02036
Plaintiff:
Matthew Chrastka, Keith Petty, Eugene Roberson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
