Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Passons v. Christensen
as 23-3820
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUSSELL ALLEN PASSONS
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY CHRISTENSEN
Sivak v. Winmill, et al.
as 23-1638
Not Yet Classified:
ID ISCI LIBRARIAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge B. LYNN WINMILL, DISTRICT JUDGE, Judge DAVID C. NYE, DISTRICT JUDGE, M. DOUGLAS HARPOOL and others
Lacey Sivak v. Jay Christensen
as 23-35453
Petitioner / Appellant:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70070
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK, B. LYNN WINMILL, Judge, DAVID C. NYE, Judge and others
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Stone v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Scott Stone
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Page et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Chad Page, Amanda Gentry, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willard v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Cody Willard
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70064
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK and JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Lacey Sivak v. Thomas, I.S.C.C. Security, et al
as 23-35278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS, I.S.C.C. SECURITY, JAPHET, I.S.C.C. SECURITY, SGT. I.S.C.C. SECURITY BEARD and others
Payne v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Erik Jon Payne
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge David C. Nye, Judge B. Lynn Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
