Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Nemmers et al v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01179
Plaintiff:
Nichole Nemmers , Jay Nelson , Nichole (I) Nemmers and others
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051
Kehl v. Clover et al
as 4:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ed Kehl
Defendant:
Joel Clover, Bayquon Macdonald, Ryan Buffinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Helmick et al
as 4:2016cv00498
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Armstrong
Defendant:
David Helmick, Jay Nelson and Jerry Bartruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts, et al. v. City of Chula Vista
as 3:2016cv01955
Plaintiff:
Darrell Roberts , Timothy Abrams , David Albright and others
Defendant:
Chula Vista, City of and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Moore v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv00352
Plaintiff:
Douglas Matthew Moore
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Mt. Pleasant Correctional Facility, Jay Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Morrison et al
as 4:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lothaire Reynolds
Defendant:
Judy Morrison, Mike Schierbrock, Jay Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hamby
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Jerry Bartruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan and Gary L Buck
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Dorothy Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan and Cassandra Zent
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Sheryl Dahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00186
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Dorothy Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
