Cases 1 - 5 of 5
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION v. FINISAR CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01213
Plaintiff:
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
Defendant:
FINISAR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
In re JDS Uniphase Corporation ERISA Litigation
as 4:2003cv04743
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Pettit
Defendant:
JDS Uniphase Corporation , Jozef Straus , Martin A. Kaplan and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Alice Hodges-Toby
Consol_defendant:
Ronald C. Foster and Steven Moore
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Hodges-Toby v. JDS Uniphase Corporation et al
as 4:2003cv04907
Plaintiff:
Alice Hodges-Toby
Defendant:
JDS Uniphase Corporation, JDS Uniphase Corporation Administrative Committee, Kevin J. Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Bd Trst of Leland, et al v. Corning Inc, et al
as 2:2000cv10584
Counter Claimant:
Agere Systems Inc, Ciena Corporation, Ericson Microelectronics AB, Optoelectronic Products and others
Unknown:
Steven D Chin, Steven D Chin, David M Kleiman and others
Defendant:
Agere Systems Inc, Alcatel S A, Alcatel USA and others
Counter Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Litton Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. JDS Uniphase Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv00584
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
JDS Uniphase Corporation, Josef Straus, Kevin N. Kalkhoven and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
