Cases 11 - 20 of 50
S.S. v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION et al
as 3:2013cv02876
Plaintiff:
S.S.
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and DR. JEFFREY BEARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Beard
as 2:2013cv00840
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Beard
as 2:2013at00444
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
In re: Hector Huerta
as 12-3849
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: HECTOR HUERTAS
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, RICHARD HALL, NANCY A. GIROUX and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
SEAN J MCLAUGHLIN, Honorable
In re: Robert Rega, et al
as 12-2513
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT GENE REGA
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS FOLINO, JEFFREY MARTIN and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
TERRENCE F. MCVERRY
In Re: Rhonshawn Jackson, et al
as 12-1657
Petitioner:
RHONSHAWN JACKSON
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, SHIRLEY SMEAL, LAWLER and others
In re: Elijah Crosby
as 11-1741
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ELIJAH CROSBY
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, JOHN W. KERESTES, DAVID W. MCANNANEY and others
Defendant - Pro Se Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M KOSIK
In re: Jay Yunik v. Catherine McVey, et al
as 11-1657
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JAY V. YUNIK
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. MCVEY, Chairperson - Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Paroles, MATTHEW T. MANGINO, Member - Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Paroles, JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary - Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
