Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447
Rafael Martinez-Rodriguez v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, DHS
as 16-60421
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01673
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00044
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moriel v. ICE et al
as 1:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jose Ivan Moriel
Defendant:
ICE, Jeh Charles Johnson, Philip T Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-40819
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: USA, et al
as 16-40795
Petitioner:
In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Respondent:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-40796
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
