Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ryan v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Hendrickson v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06919
Plaintiff:
James Hendrickson
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Hopkins v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10725
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Smith v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10698
Plaintiff:
Heather Smith
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Wang v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10338
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Timothy S. Jenks, Charles J. Abbe and others
Taylor v. NYDOCS Commissioner Cynthia Br
as 20-3984
Defendant / Appellee:
Capts. Acevedo, RNDC Co. Jenkings, MDC Who Work There in Legal Div Dept visits and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Taylor
White v. UMG Recordings, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09971
Defendant:
UMG Recordings, Inc. a Delaware Corporation, individually and doing business as Interscope Records, Jordan Carter, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Counter Defendant:
Jordan White
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jenks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01227
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Dennis G Jenks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Taylor v. NYDOCS Commissioner Cynthia Brann et al
as 1:2019cv04874
Defendant:
NYDOCS Commissioner Cynthia Brann, Batchelor Leg Law LTR Cord Nadeen Griffen, Seyomi and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenks v. ISN Corporation
as 1:2018cv06715
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert Jenks
Defendant:
ISN Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
