Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Swartz v. Kim, et al.
as 26-3726
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Respondent:
SALLIE KIM, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, WILLIAM ALSUP, DISTRICT JUDGE and UNKNOWN PARTY, Commanding Officer, Elmwood Correctional
Swartz v. USA
as 3:2026cv04709
Petitioner:
Jesse Franklin Swartz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Swartz
as 25-6643
Defendant:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Swartz v. All Article III Judges for the Northern District of California
as 25-4636
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Respondent:
ALL ARTICLE III JUDGES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Swartz v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 25-3907
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Swartz v. Araiz Ramirez
as 25-1564
Respondent:
V. ARAIZ RAMIREZ, Warden at Victorville FCI II Holding Facility
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
United States of America v. Swartz
as 25-952
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ
United States of America v. Swartz
as 24-1875
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ
Swartz v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-943
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jesse Swartz, Jr. v. USDC-CASF
as 23-70140
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ, Jr. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
