Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Drones v. Judge
as 24-20359
Defendant:
Officers, United States District Court Walker County, Texas, Officials, United States District Court Walker County, Texas, Prosecutor, United States District Court Walker County, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Drones
Drones v. Judge et al
as 4:2024cv02286
Defendant:
Prosecutor, Employees, Judge and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Drones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02285
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Drones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drones v. Officer Tristal Zegunda
as 4:2024cv02350
Defendant:
Officer Tristal Zegunda
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Drones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drones v. Med State Doctor
as 22-20471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jesse Lee Drones
Defendant / Appellee:
Medical State Doctor and Nurses, Officials, P. Sam, T. Pham and others
Drones v. U.S. District Court
as 22-20470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jesse Lee Drones
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. District Court Officials, Officials, Officers, Employees, Party Members, Staff Counsel, Judges, Prosecutor
Drones v. Judge et al
as 4:2022cv03123
Defendant:
Prosecutor, Judge, DA and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Drones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03124
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Drones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drones v. TDCJ Administration Officials et al
as 4:2021cv04241
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Drones
Defendant:
TDCJ Administration Officials, Mrs Chatelane, Mr Carralle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03885
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Drones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
