Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Hernandez v. USA
as 3:2023cv01319
Petitioner:
Jose Jesus Hernandez, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hernandez Mejia et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Jose Juan Hernandez Mejia and Eduardo Jesus Hernandez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hernandez Baca v. Garland
as 23-815
Petitioner:
JESUS HERNANDEZ BACA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Shoemaker et al v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shoemaker, Andrea L. Arroyo, Benjamin Atwell and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
USA v. Ferdik Martinez-Hernandez
as 22-10343
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FERDIK ARNOLDO MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ, AKA Jesus Hernandez
USA v. Ferdik Martinez-Hernandez
as 22-10342
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FERDIK ARNOLDO MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ, AKA Jesus Hernandez
Lechuga et al v. Stonelake Luxury Residences, LP et al
as 2:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Lechuga, Estate of Veroncia Janette Muniz, Manuel De Jesus Hernandez Chavez and others
Defendant:
Stonelake Luxury Residences, LP, Stonelake Luxury Residences GP, LLC, Invesco Reit, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hernandez-Martinez v. Garland
as 22-336
Petitioner:
JESUS HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez Mejia v. Garland
as 22-63
Petitioner:
TERESA DE JESUS HERNANDEZ MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez-Ramirez v. Garland
as 21-67
Petitioner:
ENGERTH JESUS HERNANDEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
