Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Jonas Hemmer et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Jonas Hemmer, a Minor JH, Linda Hemmer and others
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Correctional Sgt. Ashley Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021at01132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JH Kelly, LLC v. Ed Staub & Sons Petroleum, Inc.
as 4:2020cv08463
Defendant:
Ed Staub & Sons Petroleum, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JH Kelly, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe et al v. Marysville Joint Unified School District, et al.,
as 2:2020cv02290
Plaintiff:
John JO Doe, Jane CJ Doe, John HR Doe and others
Defendant:
William W. Babcock, First Presbyterian Church and Marysville Joint Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Marysville Joint Unified School District, et al.,
as 1:2020at00920
Plaintiff:
John JO Doe, Jane CJ Doe, John HR Doe and others
Defendant:
William W. Babcock, First Presbyterian Church and Marysville Joint Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JH Kelly, LLC v. Ed Staub & Sons Petroleum, Inc.
as 2:2020at00985
Defendant:
Ed Staub & Sons Petroleum, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JH Kelly, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
