Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. JIN WEN FENG, MV
as 2:2019cv11955
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company d/b/a ADM Grain Company
Defendant:
M/V JIN WEN FENG, her engines, tackle, apparel, etc., in rem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jin v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00739
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP p.l.c.
Plaintiff:
Shanyu Jin
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Jin Sui Marine, Inc. v. Minerva Marine, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01708
Plaintiff:
Jin Sui Marine, Inc.
Defendant:
Minerva Marine, Inc. and Symbol Maritime, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31325
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cargill Ferrous International v. Jin Qiang M/V et al
as 2:2008cv03822
Plaintiff:
Cargill Ferrous International and Cargill Ferrous International
Defendant:
Jin Qiang M/V, Cosco HK Shipping Co., Ltd. and Cycle Wide Shipping, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cargill Ferrous International v. Jin Kang M/V et al
as 2:2008cv01579
Plaintiff:
Cargill Ferrous International and Cargill Ferrous International
Defendant:
Jin Kang M/V, Oldendorff Carriers GMBH & Co. KG, Jin Kang Marine, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
