Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Speed v. JMA Energy Company, LLC
as 6:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
David Landon Speed
Defendant:
JMA Energy Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
JMA Energy Company LLC v. Racop
as 3:2013cv00028
Plaintiff:
JMA Energy Company LLC
Defendant:
Mark Racop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
JMA Energy Company LLC et al v. BJ Services Company USA
as 5:2008cv00738
Plaintiff:
JMA Energy Company LLC, JMA Energy Company LLC, JMA Energy Company LLC and others
Defendant:
BJ Services Company USA and BJ Services Company USA
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JMA Energy Company LLC v. Midwest Resources 93-1 Oil & Gas Income Limited Partnership et al
as 5:2007cv01215
Plaintiff:
JMA Energy Company LLC
Defendant:
Midwest Resources 93-1 Oil & Gas Income Limited Partnership, Midwest Resources 93-1 Oil & Gas Income Limited Partnership, Midwest Resources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
JMA Energy Company LLC v. Patterson-UTI Drilling LP LLLP
as 5:2007cv00100
Plaintiff:
JMA Energy Company LLC
Counter Claimant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling LP LLLP
3Rd Party Defendant:
Kaydet Oil LLC, Robert Barnard, Norco Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LP, LLLP v. JMA Energy Company, LLC
as 5:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LP, LLLP and Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LP, LLLP
Defendant:
JMA Energy Company, LLC and JMA Energy Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
