Cases 11 - 20 of 23
MARRERO v. JONES et al.
as 5:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
NOEL J MARRERO
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, JOHN A BARFIELD and ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Harris v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 17-13487
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN A. BARFIELD and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01590
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RUSS v. BARFIELD et al
as 5:2016cv00040
Petitioner:
KEVIN JOEL RUSS
Respondent:
JOHN A BARFIELD, PAMELA JO BONDI and JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. BARFIELD
as 5:2015cv00114
Petitioner:
JUSTIN LEE THOMAS
Respondent:
JOHN A BARFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOLL v. CREWS et al
as 4:2013cv00646
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO DOLL
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, JOHN A BARFIELD, JOHN L FISHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Rivera v. Apalachee CI Warden, et al
as 11-14516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
APALACHEE CI WARDEN, JOHN A. BARFIELD, Assistant Warden, Apalachee Correctional Institution, C. G. ATKINS, Assistant Warden, Apalachee Correctional Institution and others
BARFIELD et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv03526
Plaintiff:
NELLIE J. BARFIELD and JOHN H BARFIELD
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BARFIELD et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 5:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
NELLIE J BARFIELD and JOHN H BARFIELD
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARFIELD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53401
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. BARFIELD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
