Cases 1 - 9 of 9
John Fishback v. Gary Maynard
as 13-8012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. FISHBACK
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MAYNARD, Secretary of Det. Pub. Safety Correction Servs, J. M. STOUFFER, Commissioner for Maryland Division of Corrections, JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden at North Branch Correctional Institution for Division of Corrections Maryland and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6410
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benjamin Sifrit v. John Rowley
as 10-7563
Petitioner - Appellant:
BENJAMIN A. SIFRIT
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden, North Branch Correctional Institution and DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Emmanuel Sewell v. John Rowley
as 10-6463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDWARD SEWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden, IAMES, Correctional Officer, RALEY, Correctional Officer and others
Calvin Bradshaw v. Walter Wirsching
as 10-6231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN BRADSHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER WIRSCHING, Director, SHARON BAUCOM, M.D., ELEANOR BOULES, R.N. Manager and others
Warren Chase v. C. Butler
as 09-6224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
C. BUTLER, Cpl., D. HICKS, Cpl., MICHAEL HICKS, Cpl. and others
Farrakhan Symbol v. John Rowley
as 08-7498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FARRAKHAN BEY SYMBOL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden, MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner, GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary and others
Reginald Tucker v. John Rowley
as 08-6949
Petitioner - Appellant:
REGINALD S. TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. John Rowley
as 08-6693
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden, STATE OF MARYLAND and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
