Cases 41 - 50 of 262
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating For Campus Equality, et al
as 21-1853
Plaintiff:
CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others
Falmouth School Department v. Mr. and Mrs. Doe, et al
as 21-1882
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FALMOUTH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. AND MRS. DOE, on their own behalf and on behalf of their minor son JOHN DOE
Defendant:
GENE KUCINKAS
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating for Campus Equality
as 21-1784
Plaintiff:
CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others
HibiscusPR 322, LLC v. Lorenzo-Orama, et al
as 21-1844
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HIBISCUSPR 322, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
RAMON LORENZO-ORAMA, ONEIDA LORENZO-DEL VALLE, MICHAEL LORENZO-DEL VALLE and others
Does, et al v. Mills, et al
as 21-1826
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOES, 1-3, JACK DOES, 1-1000, JANE DOES, 1-6 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine, JEANNE LAMBREW, NIRAV D. SHAH, in his official capacity as Director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and others
Petitioner:
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLOBAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE and METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCHES
Santiago-Martinez, et al v. Fundacion Damas, Inc.
as 21-1718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YANIRA SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ, in representation of minor J.R.S. and RAYMOND RAMIREZ-CARABALLO, in representation of minor J.R.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
FUNDACION DAMAS, INC., d/b/a Hospital Damas, Inc., JORGE MARTINEZ-COLON, and his wife Jane Doe, in representation of their Conjugal Partnership and NORMA SOTO, in representation of their Conjugal Partnership
Defendant:
HOSPITAL DAMAS, INC., or, alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital Damas, JORGE MARTINEZ-COLON, in representation of his Conjugal Partnership and NORMA SOTO, in representation of her Conjugal Partnership
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1639
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and JACOB ZERNICKI
Respondent:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY J. HARDY, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Mr. and Ms. Doe v. Portland Public Schools
as 21-1589
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MR. AND MS. DOE, individually and as parents and next friends of JOHN DOE, a minor
Defendant / Appellant:
PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Plourde v. Redington-Fairview General Hospital, et al
as 21-1565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN PLOURDE
Defendant / Appellee:
REDINGTON-FAIRVIEW GENERAL HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, UNKNOWN REDINGTON-FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL AMBULANCE CREW MEMBER #1, JOHN DOE, UNKNOWN REDINGTON-FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL AMBULANCE CREW MEMBER #2 and others
Defendant:
SKOWHEGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, UNKNOWN SKOWHEGAN POLICE OFFICER #1, JOHN DOE, UNKNOWN SKOWHEGAN POLICE OFFICER #2 and others
Doe, et al v. Newton Public Schools, et al
as 21-1539
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and DAVID DOE
Defendant / Appellant:
MA BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS, of the Massachusetts Division of Administrative Law Appeals
Defendant:
NEWTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
