Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Boyd v. 20 John Does
as 1:2017cv01464
Plaintiff:
Marvin T. Boyd, Jr.
Defendant:
20 John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Doe v. Aspen Valley Hospital District et al
as 1:2016cv01404
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Aspen Valley Hospital District , Alicia Miller , Dawn Gilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Adams County Sheriffs Department, et al
as 1:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Marquise Demont Harris
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriffs Department, Adams County Sheriffs Department (I), Michael McIntosh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Beeman v. The City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2015cv01244
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Eugene Beeman
Defendant:
The City and County of Denver, Brian Snow, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Mayor, et al
as 1:2015cv00906
Plaintiff:
Catrice Thomas and Estate of Martel Thomas
Defendant:
Mayor for the City and County of Denver, Colorado , Executive Director of the Department of Public Safety for the City & County of Denver, Colorado , John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hynes v. Petkoff et al
as 1:2015cv00758
Plaintiff:
Cory Hynes and Kyler Livingston
Defendant:
Kiel Petkoff, Shane Musgrave, City of Steamboat Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. University of Colorado Boulder
as 1:2014cv03027
Defendant:
University of Colorado Boulder
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
