Cases 61 - 70 of 142
DAGGETT v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv00303
Defendant:
TOWN OF BERWICK, JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAGGETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUINN v. US PRISONER TRANSPORT INC et al
as 2:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
MEGHAN NICOLE QUINN
Defendant:
US PRISONER TRANSPORT INC, PRISONER TRANSPORT SYSTEMS OF AMERICA LLC, ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLSEN et al v. HAMILTON
as 1:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN OLSEN , NANCY SHAW , JANE DOE and others
Defendant:
RICKLER HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LAVERDIERE v. BALCOM et al
as 2:2017cv00343
Plaintiff:
IRIS LAVERDIERE
Defendant:
MICHAEL BALCOM, SR, AMANDA WOOLFORD , JOSEPH FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. YORK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00336
Defendant:
JOSEPH FAGONE, ROBERT HAYES, YORK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERNIER v. LINA MEDICAL USA INC et al
as 2:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D BERNIER
Defendant:
LINA MEDICAL USA INC, LINA MEDICAL APS, LINA MEDICAL POLSKA SP ZOO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGARR v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
DARLENE MCGARR
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER v. DOE
as 2:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
KIRK BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERSI v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
SHUCEYB HERSI
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, CITY OF PORTLAND, KEVIN JOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMITER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
JASON PALMITER
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, KEVIN JOYCE, JOHN DOE ONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
