Cases 81 - 89 of 89
Best Buy, L.P. v. Developers Diversified Realty Corporation et al
as 2:2007mc00065
Plaintiff:
Best Buy, L.P.
Defendant:
Developers Diversified Realty Corporation, Developers Diversified Realty Corporation, Benderson-Wainberg Associates, LP and others
Martin v. Hoffman et al
as 1:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
Byron Martin
Defendant:
Vermont Department of Corrections, R. Tasha Wallis, Jackie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bain v. Transportation Corporation of America et al
as 2:2007cv00146
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bain
Defendant:
Transportation Corporation of America, Corrections Corporation of America, Lippmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers et al v. TransCor America, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers, Robert G. Neale, Mark B. Mumley and others
Defendant:
TransCor America, Inc., William Brus and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bain v. Gorczyk et al
as 1:2007cv00116
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bain
Defendant:
John Gorczyk, Robert Hofmann, Steven Gold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bain v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bain
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Wade Warren, Lippmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Walton et al
as 1:2007cv00058
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Walton, James Polk, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaimas v. Catholic Diocese of Burlington, VT et al
as 1:2007cv00026
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shaimas
Defendant:
John Doe, I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avallone v. Hofmann et al
as 2:2007cv00001
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Susan Wehry, Prison Health Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Avallone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
