Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Brook v. Ruotolo
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellant: Adam Brook, M.D., Ph.D. and The Estate of Dr. Judith Brook
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph Ruotolo, Esq., Ira Salzman, Esq., Diana Rosenthal, Esq. and others
Defendant: Anthony Bacchi, M.D.
Gem Financial Service, Inc. v. City of New York
as 23-1205
Plaintiff: Mitchell Kaminsky, (a majority shareholder of GEM Financial Service, Inc.) and Keith Watts
Plaintiff / Appellee: Gem Financial Service, Inc., DBA Gem Pawnbrokers
Defendant: New York City Police Department and Police Officers John Doe #1-10
Defendant / Appellant: City of New York
Eckhaus v. City of New York
as 23-846
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mordechai Eckhaus
Defendant / Appellee: City of New York, New York Police Department, Police Officer Andrea Lemmon and others
Defendant: Police Officers John Does 1-10, (assaulting police officers) in their official and individual capacities
Santiago v. Fischer
as 23-855
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jesus Santiago
Defendant / Appellee: Anthony J. Annucci, individually and as Deputy Commissioner of and Counsel to DOCS, Terrence X. Tracy, individually and as Chief Counsel to DOP and Superintendent Brian Fischer, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Defendant: Andrew M. Cuomo, individually and as Governor of the State of New York, Andrea W. Evans, individually and as Chairwoman of the New York State Board of Parole, State of New York and others
Santiago v. Fischer
as 23-814
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jesus Santiago
Defendant: Andrew M. Cuomo, individually and as Governor of the State of New York, Andrea W. Evans, individually and as Chairwoman of the New York State Board of Parole, State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant: Superintendent Brian Fischer, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, individually and as Deputy Commissioner of and Counsel to DOCS and Terrence X. Tracy, individually and as Chief Counsel to DOP
Garland v. New York City Fire Department
as 23-663
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Garland, Vincent Bottalico, Timothy A. Heaton and others
Defendant / Appellee: New York City Fire Department, Daniel A. Nigro, John Doe #1-10 and others
Defendant: Uniformed Fire Officers Association, Local 854 International Association of Firefighters, Affiliated with the AFL-CIO and Uniformed Firefighters Association of Greater New York
Patel v. Incorporated Village of Old Brookville
as 23-651
Plaintiff / Appellee: Neal Patel
Defendant: Incorporated Village of Old Brookville, Old Brookville Village Police Department, Police Officer Michael J. Marino, in his official and individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant: Police Officer William Reavy, in his official and individual capacity
Harris v. Tioga County
as 23-652
Plaintiff / Appellee: Calvin Harris
Defendant: Tioga County District Attorney's Office, Unidentified Jane/John Doe #1-10 Tioga County Employees, Tioga County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Steven Anderson, New York State Police Investigator and Susan Mulvey, New York State Police Investigator
Patel v. Incorporated Village of Old Brookville
as 23-609
Plaintiff / Appellee: Neal Patel
Defendant: Incorporated Village of Old Brookville, Old Brookville Village Police Department, Police Officer Thomas Lamb, in his official and individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant: Police Officer Michael J. Marino, in his official and individual capacity
Harris v. Tioga County
as 23-503
Plaintiff / Appellee: Calvin Harris
Defendant: Tioga County District Attorney's Office, Unidentified Jane/John Doe #1-10 Tioga County Employees, Steven Anderson, New York State Police Investigator and others
Defendant / Appellant: Tioga County and Gerald Keene, Former Tioga County District Attorney

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?