Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Alcock, Jr v. Doe (1-5)
as 4:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Gordon Bradford Alcock
Defendant:
John Doe (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Alex Nelson, et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
as 21-3740
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alex Nelson and Iris Nelson
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Gerald Leyshock, COI, in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Charlene Deeken and John Does, 1-3
Emily Davis v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 21-3526
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Emily Davis
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities and Charlene Deeken
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerald Leyshock, COL., in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
James Tanner v. Kurt Ziegenhorn, et al
as 21-3462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Andrew Tanner
Defendant / Appellee:
Kurt Ziegenhorn, in his individual capacity, Bill Bryant, Colonel, in his official capacity as head of the Arkansas State Police, an agency of the State of Arkansas and William Sadler, "Bill", in his individual capacity
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-5, individually and in their official capacity, Mike Kennedy, Individually and Elizabeth Chapman, Individually
Dillan Newbold v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 21-3108
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dillan Newbold
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Terrence Ruffin and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerald Leyshock, COL., in his individual an official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, T., in his individual and official capacities and others
Brian Baude v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 20-2864
Defendant / Appellant:
Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Bockskopf, Matthew T. Karnowski, SGT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Brian Baude
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri and John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities
Jane Doe v. North Homes, Inc., et al
as 20-1974
Defendant / Appellee:
John Does 1-5, in their individual capacities, John Does 6-10, in their individual and official capacities, Devin Michael Wood, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jane Doe, (a pseudonym)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv05019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eric Thurairajah v. Trooper Lagarian Cross
as 19-3603
Defendant:
City of Fort Smith, Arkansas, John Does 1-5, individually and in their official capacity in their roles as an employee of the City of Fort Smith, The State of Arkansas, The Arkansas State Police and/or Employee of Sebastian County, Bill Hollenbeck, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff for the County of Sebastian and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Trooper Lagarian Cross, individually and in his Official Capacity as a State Trooper with and for the State of Arkansas, also known as L. Cross
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Eric Roshaun Thurairajah
Eric Thurairajah v. Trooper Lagarian Cross
as 19-3530
Defendant:
City of Fort Smith, Arkansas, Sebastian County, Arkansas, John Does 1-5, individually and in their official capacity in their roles as an employee of the City of Fort Smith, The State of Arkansas, The Arkansas State Police and/or Employee of Sebastian County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Trooper Lagarian Cross, individually and in his Official Capacity as a State Trooper with and for the State of Arkansas, also known as L. Cross
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Roshaun Thurairajah
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
