Cases 11 - 20 of 34
ZAUDERER v. AESTHETIC D-SIGN INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv11749
Plaintiff:
MARC J ZAUDERER
Defendant:
AESTHETIC D-SIGN INTERNATIONAL, INC., John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ZAUDERER v. DENT AMERICA WHOLESALE INC. et al
as 1:2016cv11751
Plaintiff:
MARC J ZAUDERER
Defendant:
DENT AMERICA WHOLESALE INC., John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ZAUDERER v. CIRRUS CONSULTING GROUP (USA), INC. et al
as 1:2016cv11742
Plaintiff:
MARC J ZAUDERER
Defendant:
CIRRUS CONSULTING GROUP (USA), INC., John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cichocki et al v. Bank Of America et al
as 1:2015cv13269
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cichocki and Y. Dolly Hwang
Defendant:
Bank Of America, 32 Pickney Street Condominium Trust and Association, Vicky R. Oleskey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
US v. Rohena-Villega
as 13-2456
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTO ROHENA-VILLEGA, a/k/a John Doe 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11938
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Agenus, Inc. et al v. Doe 1
as 1:2011cv11633
Plaintiff:
Agenus, Inc. and John Doe 2
Defendant:
John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Prime PPV, Inc. v. John Doe d/b/a Colmado Soto et al
as 3:2011cv01906
Plaintiff:
Prime PPV, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Doe 1-Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25
Agenus, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2011cv11634
Plaintiff:
Agenus, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Melendez et al
as 3:2009cv01454
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Gilberto Melendez, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
