Other Statutes Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
DOE 2 v. Test
as 1:2022cv99999
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE 2
Defendant: Training Test
Rodger Nunley v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 21-1946
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODGER NUNLEY
BORJA DE ARGUETA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv03093
Defendant: Jane Doe, John Doe #4, Behavioral Interventions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Dina Suzana Borja de Argueta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Timothy Elkins, Jr. v. John Varga, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2645
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY W. ELKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Ashoor Rasho v. John Doe 1, et al
as 20-2415
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Plaintiff / Appellant: ASHOOR RASHO
Calvin Williams v. Sergeant Bowen, et al
as 19-3508
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE, #2 Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE, #1 correctional officer and SERGEANT BOWEN
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALVIN WILLIAMS
Michael Lee v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 19-2013
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS J. DART, JOHN DOE, Classification Officer, JOHN DOE 2, Classification Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL A. LEE
Michael Lee v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 19-1989
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS J. DART, JOHN DOE, Classification Officer, JOHN DOE 2, Classification Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL A. LEE
Pedro Donaldson v. City of Chicago, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1115
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE 2, Officer, CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: PEDRO DONALDSON
Clark v. Pie Pepper Bakery Company et al
as 1:2019cv00138
Defendant: John Doe #2, Dr John Doe #1 and Pie Pepper Bakery Company
Plaintiff: Daniel Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?