Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 91 - 100 of 111
Carl Fulton v. Unknown Partie
as 12-16352
Plaintiff - Appellant: CARL DAVID FULTON
Defendant - Appellee: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe 1 and John Doe 2, Phoenix Police Officers
John Doe #1, et al v. Sam Reed, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35854
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
Matthew Tarabochia v. Mickey Adkins, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35837
Plaintiff - Appellant: MATTHEW ALEXANDER TARABOCHIA
Plaintiff: ALEX DANIEL TARABOCHIA
Defendant: FBI SPECIAL AGENT MI ADKINS
Defendant - Appellee: SERGEANT DAN CHADWICK, Wash. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, OFFICER BRETT HOPKINS, Wash. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, JOHN DOE 1 and others
William Thornton v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 11-56307
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee: MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections, RICHARD HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Corrections, PICATOSTE, Jane Doe, Registered Nurse and others
Jon Corso v. John Doe 1, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-16524
Plaintiff - Appellant: JON THOMAS CORSO
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN DOE 1, Warden, JOHN DOE 2, Medical Administrator and SHARI KIMOTO, Administrator
Michael Hicks v. L. Rowe, et al
as 11-55785
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL JAMES HICKS
Defendant - Appellee: L. ROWE, in individual capacity and as Senior Librarian in official capacity, JOHN DOE 1, in individual capacity and as A4 AD SEG LTA in official capacity, JOHN DOE 2, in individual capacity and as A4 AD SEG Sergeant Second Watch in official capacity and others
William Thornton v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 11-55277
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee: MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections, RICHARD HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Corrections, PICATOSTE, Jane Doe, Registered Nurse and others
Ronald Baugh v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-35145
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD M. BAUGH
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FBI and others
Michael Moss, et al v. Tim Wood, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36172
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL MOSS, LESLEY ADAMS, BETH WILCOX and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, of the Department of Homeland Security, RALPH BASHAM, Former Director of the United States Secret Service, in his individual capacity, JOHN DOE, 1, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities, participating in these actions and known to the Defendant Secret Service, but unknown at this time to Plaintiffs and others
Defendant - Appellant: TIM WOOD, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities and ROB SAVAGE, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities
Michael Moss, et al v. Ron Ruecker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36152
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL MOSS, LESLEY ADAMS, BETH WILCOX and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, of the Department of Homeland Security, RALPH BASHAM, Former Director of the United States Secret Service, in his individual capacity, TIM WOOD, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant: RON RUECKER, Superintendent of the Oregon State Police, in his official and individual capacities, ERIC RODRIQUEZ, former Captain of the Southwest Regional Headquarters of the Oregon State Police, in his official and individual capacities, TIM F. MCCLAIN, Superintendent of the Oregon State Police, in his official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?