Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Salary v. Goff, et al
as 13-3258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK T. SALARY
Defendant - Appellee:
DINNIS GOFF, SAM CLINE, JOHN DOE, (1) and others
Sanders v. Ketron et al
as 5:2013cv03165
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Sanders
Defendant:
John M. Ketron, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salary (ID 96349) v. Cline et al
as 5:2013cv03147
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Salary
Defendant:
Sam Cline, (fnu) Potter, (fnu) Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sellers (ID 99071) v. Cline et al
as 5:2013cv03076
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Sellers, Jr.
Defendant:
Sam Cline, Ray Roberts, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salary (ID 96349) v. Goff et al
as 5:2013cv03052
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Salary
Defendant:
Dinnis Goff, Sam Cline, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. City of Lakewood, et al
as 13-1091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORREY V. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, (Supervisor) Lakewood Police Dept., OFFICER JANE DOE, Lakewood Police Dept., OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, Lakewood Police Dept. and others
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 12-6109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and others
Golston (ID 40507) v. Bloomquist et al
as 5:2012cv03046
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Golston
Defendant:
Ray Bloomquist, James Moore, Brice Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rueb, et al v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JOSEPH RUEB, RAYMOND CAIN, JACOB OAKLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, ROBERT ALLEN, EUGENE ATHERTON and others
Culp v. Williams, et al
as 11-1242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY CULP
Defendant - Appellee:
DENO WILLIAMS, HARRY CAMPBELL, Lieutenant CO John Doe (1), CO John Doe (2), SUSAN JONES, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
