Cases 61 - 70 of 96
Lockett v. State of Indiana/Department of Corrections
as 3:2014cv01739
Plaintiff:
Marques R Lockett
Defendant:
Indiana State of Department of Corrections, Mark Sevier, K Ultle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Alonzo Smith v. P.O. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2014cv05261
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Smith
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe #1 and P.O. John Doe #2
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dix v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2014cv03620
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dix
Defendant:
Mark J. Sullivan , Janet Napolitano , Julia Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schindler v. Advocate Healthcare et al
as 1:2014cv00880
Plaintiff:
Robert Schindler
Defendant:
Advocate Healthcare, Park Ridge Police Department, Municipality of Park Ridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 3:2013cv03218
Plaintiff:
Livell Figgs
Defendant:
Alex Dawson , Austin S Randolph, Jr , Lori Fishel and others
Respondent:
John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 1:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Livell Figgs
Defendant:
Alex Dawson, Austin S. Randolph, Jr., Lori Fishel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Stolz et al
as 1:2012cv01473
Plaintiff:
John R Banks
Defendant:
Jeff Stolz, Ryan Smith, Nathan Usinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv08148
Plaintiff:
Darrin Wright
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tally v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv05263
Plaintiff:
Willie Tally
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoller v. Cook County et al
as 1:2012cv04928
Defendant:
Cook County , Thomas Dart , Cook County Department Of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Stoller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
