Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Bauss v. A-1 Bail Bond Agency, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv12533
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bauss
Defendant:
A-1 Bail Bond Agency, Inc., Matthew Maddock, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McPhail v. Macomb, County of et al
as 2:2012cv12134
Plaintiff:
Julie McPhail
Defendant:
Macomb, County of , Macomb County Sheriff's Department , Anthony Wickersham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2011cv14274
Defendant:
Wayne, County of , John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Plaintiff:
Julan Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv13518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Weathers v. City of Detroit Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv12489
Plaintiff:
Jerry Weathers
Defendant:
City of Detroit Police Department , John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cannon et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2010cv14223
Plaintiff:
Kareem Cannon and Dominique Reynolds
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Marvin Redmond, Ray Jopes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Card v. Tourville et al
as 2:2010cv13187
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Card
Defendant:
Gregory Tourville, Jane Doe #1, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Tourville et al
as 2:2010cv13186
Defendant:
Gregory Tourville, City of Detroit, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyrtsos et al v. Cash-Calhoun et al
as 2:2010cv12295
Defendant:
Latonya Cash-Calhoun, Danielle Unknown, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Christos Kyrtsos , Margaret Kyrtsos and Angela Kyrtsos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kasham v. Van Buren Township Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv12104
Plaintiff:
AHMAD KASHAM
Defendant:
Van Buren Township Police Department , JESSICA SHIPPE , MICHAEL PAPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
