Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Durell et al v. Barnes et al
as 6:2023cv03382
Plaintiff:
Brid Durell and Aaron Cody White
Defendant:
OFC Brett Barnes, OFC J. Carter, Sheriff Jim C. Arnott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manos v. Nodaway County Sheriff et al
as 4:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
STACEY E MANOS
Defendant:
NODAWAY COUNTY SHERIFF, JOHN DOE #1, DIRECTOR OF JAIL, COUNTY OF NODAWAY, MISSOURI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe et al
as 6:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Scott et al
as 6:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
R. Scott, Dr. Moose, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Doe #1 et al
as 6:2022cv03141
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Orr v. Lindsey et al
as 3:2022cv05032
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lynn Orr
Defendant:
Matthew Lindsey, Henson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betts v. Jackson County Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Jackson County Missouri, Corrections Officer Linton Mckenzie, Captain Tony Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Eugene Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deboe v. Korneman et al
as 5:2020cv06180
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, John Doe #4, sherrie KORNEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
MELANIE d DEBOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Leach et al
as 4:2018cv00709
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 3, Dave Leach and others
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
