Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (DTB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (DTB), John Doe #2 (MAB), John Doe #3 (DJB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patton v. Williamson County et al
as 3:2020cv00422
Defendant:
City of Franklin, Williamson County, City of Brentwood and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norfleet v. Renner et al
as 3:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Norfleet
Defendant:
Heather Ann Renner, Judy Farris , Houston County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milby v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01212
Plaintiff:
Raymond Milby
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Overton County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Lucas White
Defendant:
Overton County, Tennessee , John Garrett , Erin Renae Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ibrahim v. Meadows et al
as 3:2016cv02826
Plaintiff:
Shemeka Ibrahim
Defendant:
f/n/u Meadows, TrustPoint, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rymer v. Lemaster et al
as 3:2016cv02711
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Rymer
Defendant:
Robert Lemaster, Doug Sterrett, Laura Sterrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
