Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brud Rossmann v. Peter Newsham, et al
as 21-7130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant / Appellee:
Peter Newsham, Chief of Police, Philip Robinson, Sergeant, Robert Gibson, Badge #4981 (or #4081) and others
Atm Khalid v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
as 21-35376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
XENCARE SOFTWARE, INC. and ATM SHAFIQUL KHALID, Esquire, an individual and on behalf of similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., John Doe n
Brud Rossmann v. Sergey Ivanov, et al
as 20-7100
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe, 2, John Doe N, Sergey Ivanov and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brud Rossmann
Brud Rossman v. Miriam Sewell, et al
as 20-7064
Defendant / Appellee:
Metropolitan Police Department, John Doe N, William Lyke, Detective and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brad Rudolph Rossman
Brud Rossman v. Elizabeth Wingo, et al
as 20-7053
Defendant / Appellee:
Elizabeth Wingo, Judge, D.C. Superior Court D.C. Courthouse, Zachrous Hunter, Deputy Executive Director CCNV, Rico Harris, Executive Director CCNV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brad Rudolph Rossman, Esquire
Brud Rossmann v. Terrence Austin, et al
as 20-7050
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia Public Defender Services, John Doe N, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Brud Rossmann v. Lennert Leader, et al
as 20-5168
Defendant / Appellee:
Lennert Leader, Gina Haspel, Director The U.S Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Michael G. Harvey, U.S. Magistrate and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Khalid et al v. Citrix Systems Inc
as 2:2020cv00711
Defendant:
Citrix Systems Inc and John Doe n
Plaintiff:
Atm Shafiqul Khalid and Xencare Software Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROSSMANN v. UNITED STATES STATE DEPARTMENT PASSPORT DIVISION et al
as 1:2020cv00503
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE N, MICHAEL POMPEO, CRYSTAL IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
