Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hutton Toys, LLC v. Xiaojun et al
as 1:2021cv06913
Plaintiff:
HUTTON TOYS, LLC
Defendant:
Ye Xiaojun, Xiang Zuojin, John Doe Companies 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Larusson v. Biddle et al
as 1:2021cv04895
Defendant:
916 Entertainment Group, LLC, Bad Azz Records, LLC, Bad Azz Music Publishing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Arni Larusson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Corker et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00290
Plaintiff:
Melanie Bondera, Colehour Bondera, Robert Smith and others
Defendant:
Cameron's Coffee and Distribution Company, Gold Coffee Roasters, Inc., Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Buchalter PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc. v. Kraff's Men's Wear Co., Inc.
as 3:2014cv00628
Defendant:
John Doe Companies 1-20, Daniel P. Johnson and Kraff's Men's Wear Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
John Wiley & Son, Inc. v. John Does Nos. 1-20
as 1:2012cv05450
Plaintiff:
John Wiley & Son, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does Nos. 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., v. John Doe Nos. 1-20
as 1:2012cv05448
Plaintiff:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
Defendant:
John Doe Nos. 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. John doe Nos. 1-20
as 1:2012cv04941
Plaintiff:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
John doe Nos. 1-20
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Doe Nos. 1-20
as 1:2012cv04732
Plaintiff:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe Nos. 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC. v. JOHN DOES NO. 1-20
as 1:2007cv02988
Plaintiff:
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES NO. 1-20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
