Cases 11 - 20 of 5,766
Jeude v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
USA, United States Marshalls Service, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Woodside et al
as 3:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Darrion Brown
Defendant:
Lt Woodside, C/O Cook, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rico Sanders v. Tony Evers, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICO SANDERS
Defendant:
TONY EVERS, KEVIN CARR and JANE OR JOHN DOE
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Box v. Slattery et al
as 1:2024cv03616
Plaintiff:
Martell M. Box
Defendant:
Amy Slattery, Frances Milsap, Barea Miggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Clarkson et al
as 3:2024cv03101
Plaintiff:
Peter Jennings
Defendant:
. Clarkson, . Howard, William Coonrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv03485
Plaintiff:
Ellean Nance
Defendant:
Latonya Hughes, C. Truitt and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Paulsen et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Denzel Samonta Rivers
Defendant:
Heather Paulsen, Steven Johnson, Bradley Everson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
