Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Kinning v. SRA Associates, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00293
Defendant:
SRA Associates, LLC, John Doe and John Does
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Kinning
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sevela v. Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C.
as 8:2018cv00390
Defendant:
John Does and Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C.
Plaintiff:
James Sevela
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Myers v. Niroomand-Rad et al
as 8:2017mc00117
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Michael Niroomand-Rad, Mohsen Niroomand-Rad and others
Trustee:
Patricia Fahey
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Myers
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
TOBA, Inc. v. Doe
as 4:2017cv03120
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
TOBA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Interception of Electronic Communication
Thomas et al v. Alexander Open Systems et al
as 8:2015cv00295
Defendant:
Alexander Open Systems, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Robert Brian Thomas
Relator Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Doe v. United States of America et al
as 8:1984cv00803
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Stanley E. Morris, United States Marshal's Service for the District of Nebraska and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Wickenkamp v. Smith et al
as 8:2013cv00262
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, B & J Partners, Cline Williams Wright Johnson & Oldfather, L.L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Wickenkamp
Richardson v. VIP Research, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv00165
Defendant:
John Doe and VIP Research, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Rehbein v. Nelson, et al
as 4:1994cv03244
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John Doe 1-1000, E. Benjamin Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Cary Nelson Rehbein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
