Cases 11 - 20 of 1,462
Minton v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Robert Minton
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Police Department, Officer Balmore Cruz and others
Calhoun v. Lamb et al
as 1:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Ansley Calhoun
Defendant:
Almatin Lamb, Jamal Mustafa, Gregory Tillman and others
John Doe v. Commissioner Florida Department of Law Enforcement
as 24-11185
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mya Green, et al v. U.S. DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility, et al
as 24-11075
Plaintiff:
MYA R. GREEN and WILLIAM L. GREEN
Defendant:
U.S. DOJ OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Love v. Kirby et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Love
Defendant:
Dane Kirby, Sgt. Kacy Godsey, Sgt. Katie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tiffany Wingo, et al v. Branson Harris, et al
as 24-10933
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY WINGO, KIEARA WINGO, ERIKA WINGO and others
Defendant:
BRANSON HARRIS, CHARLES GORDON, PAUL WILKERSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Kempe v. City of Cape Coral et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Scott Kempe
Defendant:
City of Cape Coral, Cape Coral City Council, John Gunther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Rosete v. City of Homestead et al
as 1:2024cv20935
Defendant:
Yaneitsy Rosete, City of Homestead, Officer Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
