Cases 11 - 20 of 1,615
DOE v. PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GUL v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
RUBINA GUL
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, CONRAD TRIBBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ZEATH et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
KAMAL ZEATH, FATHIMA RASHFA RAHMAN and ZIDAN AHMED ZEATH
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, BAXTER HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HOSUR v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
POOVI RAVINDRA HOSUR
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, PATRICIA A. LACINA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EMMANUEL AGBARA, INNOCENT OPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIVOV v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR SIVOV
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, JOHN GINKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
