Cases 1 - 10 of 1,883
Lokesh Vuyyuru v. Y.S. Reddy, et al
as 24-7066
Plaintiff:
Lokesh B. Vuyyuru, M.D.
Defendant:
Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, Gowtham Adani, Klaus Schwab and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Hodings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CAMIRE et al v. ALCOA USA CORP. et al
as 1:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
MARTHA BRENNAN CAMIRE, CRAIG JEFFERSON, DAVID LYN SHEPHERD and others
Defendant:
ALCOA USA CORP., ALCOA CORP., ALCOA BENEFITS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
KATOLA et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
NABIL ELYAS HIRMIZ KATOLA and EKHLASS DAWOOD SHAMAOON BEDAWEED
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, SCOTT M. OUDKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
as 24-5077
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, (i.e. Federal Judges), Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Administration FBOP Grand Prairie Texas Designation Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
