Cases 1 - 10 of 443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00273
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hammons v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Savannah Hammons
Defendant:
Tiffany Wolfe, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tiwaz v. Hanna et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Sir Tiwaz, Cea Gleanbead Mai, Cea G. Mai and others
Defendant:
Adrienne M. Hanna, Cerisini, Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Tyree Lockett
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Lt. Ngduea, Sgt. Slayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Sheena Robinson
Defendant:
Officer John Rhodes, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Patricella v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Bruce Patricella
Defendant:
John Doe, Sgt. Smith and Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Defendant:
John Doe and United States of America et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tulowitzky v. Burley et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
William Tulowitzky
Defendant:
Katrina Burley, C/O White, C/O Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Happle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Kathleen Wilson, Doctor John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
