Cases 31 - 40 of 765
Kennedy v. Fields et al
as 2:2023cv11949
Plaintiff:
Montaz Kennedy
Defendant:
Samuel Fields, Erin Porter, Willie J Johnson and others
Doe et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tim Brown
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Anica Letica, One Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barrett v. Shelly et al
as 2:2023cv11609
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lynn Barrett
Defendant:
Shelly, Warren, Hartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv11597
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Nelson and Albert Thrower
Defendant:
Robert Scott, Service Towing, Inc., Able Towing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Penske Logistics LLC
as 2:2023cv11579
Plaintiff:
Virginia Watson
Defendant:
Penske Logistics LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Garner v. Haines et al
as 2:2023cv11555
Plaintiff:
Chad Garner
Defendant:
Corey Haines, The City Of Madison Heights, Jeff Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nixon v. Detroit, City of et al
as 5:2023cv11547
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nixon
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Detective Moises Jimenez, Commander James Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Warren et al
as 2:2023cv11544
Plaintiff:
Jaquwan John Smith
Defendant:
City of Warren, Officer Matthew James Rodriguez, Officer John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reid v. Shoudy et al
as 2:2023cv11358
Plaintiff:
Charles Reid
Defendant:
Tristan Shoudy, John Doe and Port Huron, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
