Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BAY, INC. v. BURKE, SR. et al
as 3:2022cv04348
Plaintiff:
SAVE BARNEGAT BAY, INC.
Defendant:
DONALD F. BURKE, SR., DONALD F. BURKE, JR., PATRICIA BURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Injunctive/Declarato
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv00889
3Rd Party Defendant:
PETER MOCCO, ABC COMPANY, 1-10 and JOHN DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv00889
3Rd Party Defendant:
PETER MOCCO, ABC COMPANY, 1-10 and JOHN DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE ESTATE OF ROSARIO RAPISARDI et al v. THE ESTATE OF HARRY LANGE AND LAURILEE LANGE et al
as 1:2018cv14842
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ROSARIO RAPISARDI and JAMES P. RAPISARDI
Defendant:
RONALD JENKINS, JOHN DOES 1-10, CHRISTOPHER MONTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BISSELL v. GRAVELEY BROTHERS ROOFING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv04677
Plaintiff:
RUTH MARY BISSELL
Defendant:
GRAVELEY BROTHERS ROOFING CORPORATION, MICHAEL GRAVELEY, JOHN GRAVELEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DATTILO REALTY v. CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02278
Plaintiff:
DATTILO REALTY
Defendant:
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS, 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
AGNES, et al v. E.I. DUPONT, et al
as 2:1998cv01405
Defendant:
E.I. DUPONT DENEMOURS , DUPONT SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, JOHN DOES(1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN AGNES , Nicholas W. Fern , Joyce Fern and others
Consol_plaintiff:
LOUELLA POCREVA, KATHLEEN POCREVA , MAUREEN POCREVA MCGOWAN and others
Consol_defendant:
E.I. DUPONT DE NUMOURS & CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
