Cases 61 - 70 of 143
Tuck v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03185
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tuck
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv03103
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E. Freeman and Larry Freeman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03104
Plaintiff:
Doris Martin and Lillard Martin
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03108
Plaintiff:
Melissa Moore
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colon et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03102
Plaintiff:
Julissa Hernandez Colon and Edgardo Ferrer
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Correa et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02973
Plaintiff:
Lydia Correa and Jose Correa
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ivey et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv03002
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Ivey and Michael Ivey
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02989
Plaintiff:
Shannon L. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Combs v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv02996
Plaintiff:
Tanzania N. Combs
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02879
Plaintiff:
Lisa A. Russell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
