Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Magnum Magnetics Corporation v. RSH Indistries, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01061
Plaintiff:
Magnum Magnetics Corporation
Defendant:
RSH Indistries, LLC, Astral Adhesives & Coatings, Inc., Vikas Singhal and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
v. Magnum Magnetics Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv01060
Defendant:
Magnum Magnetics Corporation, Brian Hinderer, RSH Indistries, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Magnum Magnetics Corporation v. RSH Indistries, LLC et al
as 1:2016oe01061
Plaintiff:
Magnum Magnetics Corporation
Defendant:
RSH Indistries, LLC, Astral Adhesives & Coatings, Inc., Vikas Singhal and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Mario's Express Service, Inc. v. Pilot Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Mario's Express Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Pilot Corporation , Pilot Corporation Travel Centers, LLC , Pilot Flying J and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Connor Corporation v. Drakes Creek Marine Works, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00867
Plaintiff:
Connor Corporation
Defendant:
Drakes Creek Marine Works, Inc., Wolfard Marine Works, Inc., Donald Wolfard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Herrick et al v. Liberty League International et al
as 1:2007cv00936
Plaintiff:
Richard Herrick and Colleen Herrick
Defendant:
Liberty League International, Brent Payne, Shane Krider and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Total Benefits Planning Agency, et al v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shi, et al
as 07-4115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOTAL BENEFITS PLANNING AGENCY, INC., THOMAS QUIGLEY, CHRISTY QUIGLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD, ANTHEM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS OF KENTUCKY and others
Beall v. Au Optronics Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv02165
Plaintiff:
Scott Beall
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp., Au Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
