Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01976
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00391
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01261
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01260
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01239
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tipoo v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv01350
Plaintiff: Mohammed A. Tipoo
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel Rathbun v. Indymac Mortgage Services, et al
as 13-35065
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL W. RATHBUN
Defendant - Appellee: INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES, ONE WEST BANK, FSB and JOHN DOES, 1-25
George Young, Jr. v. State of Hawaii, et al
as 12-17808
Defendant / Appellee: JANE DOES, 1-25, JOHN DOES, 1-25, NEIL ABERCROMBIE, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii and others
Amicus Curiae: THE FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC., HAWAII RIFLE ASSOCIATION, VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORGE K. YOUNG, Jr.
Rathburn v. Indymac Mortgage Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2012cv00049
Plaintiff: Daniel W. Rathbun
Defendant: Indymac Mortgage Services, One West Bank, FSB and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?