Cases 1 - 6 of 6
HARDY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01017
Petitioner:
JOHN HARDY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Stephen Collins, et al v. Carnival PLC, et al
as 12-15215
:
In re: INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORTATION SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN COLLINS, NICHOLAS L. JENKINS, JOHN C. GORNIK and others
Claimant - Appellant:
CARNIVAL PLC
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., UAL CORP., AIR INDIA, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS, LTD. and BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC
Hardy v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2009cv03126
Plaintiff:
John Hardy and John Hardy
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, AstraZeneca, LP, AstraZeneca, AB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Stephen Collins, et al v. Duncan Vere-Hopegood, et al
as 08-17477
:
In re: INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORTATION SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEPHEN COLLINS, NICHOLAS L. JENKINS, JOHN C. GORNIK and others
Appellant:
DUNCAN VERE-HOPEGOOD, DOMINIC HAGGER and TRACY HAGGER
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., UAL CORP., AIR INDIA, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS, LTD. and BRITISH AIWAYS, PLC
Stephen Collins, et al v. Vere-Hopegood, et al
as 08-17323
:
In re: INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORTATION SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEPHEN COLLINS, NICHOLAS L. JENKINS, JOHN C. GORNIK and others
Appellant:
DUNCAN VERE-HOPEGOOD, DOMINIC HAGGER and TRACY HAGGER
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., UAL CORP., AIR INDIA, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS, LTD. and BRITISH AIWAYS, PLC
John Hardy Surrantt v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-66402
Plaintiff:
John Hardy Surrantt
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
