Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Woods v. Cooper et al
as 6:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
John Lee Woods
Defendant:
Warden II Brian Cooper, Asst Warden Traci L Shirey, Asst Warden Michael A Collum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03012
Plaintiff:
John Lee Vaughn
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Basey v. Muniz et al
as 4:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
John Lee Basey
Defendant:
Donald E. Muniz and Harris County Dept of Vital Statistics for the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Basey v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2020cv00756
Plaintiff:
John Lee Basey
Defendant:
S Wolske, Cynithia Lofton, Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Basey v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2020cv02132
Plaintiff:
John Lee Basey
Defendant:
S Wolske, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, S Nava and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Transitional Planning Dept. - Southern Region - Institutional Division
as 7:2019cv00073
Plaintiff:
John Lee Cook
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Transitional Planning Dept. - Southern Region - Institutional Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Basey v. Trump et al
as 4:2018cv00532
Petitioner:
John Lee Basey
Respondent:
Donald John Trump, Sr. and Adam Szubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cook v. Gilles et al
as 7:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
John Lee Cook
Defendant:
George D. Jody Gilles and Gary Painter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cockerham, Jr. v. Braggs et al
as 3:2017cv00160
Respondent:
Warden Braggs, Rachel Chapa, Asst. Warden Shacks and others
Petitioner:
John Lee Cockerham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
