Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Theodore Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-55174
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE O'DELL WILSON, and on behalf of those similarly situated
Respondent - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Theodore Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-55170
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE O'DELL WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Marcos Florez v. John Marshall
as 11-70256
Petitioner:
MARCOS FLOREZ
Respondent:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Jose Guzman v. John Marshall
as 11-55061
Petitioner - Appellee:
JOSE GUZMAN
Respondent - Appellant:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Gary Hughes v. John Marshall
as 11-55046
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY LEE HUGHES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Alvin Richardson v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 11-15033
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALVIN RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, California Men's Colony
Dennis Hezekiah v. John Marshall, et al
as 11-55011
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS MENELIK HEZEKIAH
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, California Men's Colony and JEANNE WOODFORD, Director, California Department of Corrections
Barry Jameson v. John Marshall
as 10-57059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY SIMON JAMESON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden of California Men's Colony, et al
Kevin Morgan v. John Marshall
as 10-56825
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN DEON MORGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Richard Schoenfeld v. John Marshall
as 10-56819
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD SCHOENFELD
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.