Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Creiglow v. Merchant
as 23-3973
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY ALLEN CREIGLOW
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN MERCHANT
Allan Cox v. John Merchant
as 2:2023cv08089
Petitioner:
Allan Cox
Respondent:
John Merchant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Allen Creiglow v. John Merchant
as 5:2023cv01885
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Allen Creiglow
Respondent:
John Merchant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orion Milum v. John Merchant
as 2:2023cv06839
Petitioner:
Orion Milum
Respondent:
Acting Warden John Merchant and John Merchant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orion Milum v. John Merchant
as 5:2023cv01704
Petitioner:
Orion Milum
Respondent:
John Merchant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Sabino Quair III v. James Hill et al
as 5:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
David Sabino Quair III and David Sabino Quair, III
Defendant:
James Hill, John Merchant, H. Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alejandro Antonio Conrado v. John Merchant et al
as 5:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Antonio Conrado
Defendant:
John Merchant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duane Magee v. John Merchant
as 5:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Duane M. Magee
Defendant:
John Merchant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lepe v. Merchant
as 3:2022cv08920
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Lepe
Respondent:
John Merchant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
