Cases 31 - 40 of 224
Demos v. Jackson
as 2:2022cv01038
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv05539
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Brusic
as 2:2022cv00954
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph A Brusic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Satterberg
as 2:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Satterberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv05480
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Rob M Jackson, Jay Inslee and Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv05464
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Robert M Jackson, Jay Robert Inslee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv05463
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Rob Jackson, Jay Inslee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Immett et al
as 2:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Jeffrey Immett, Doug McMillon and John Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Grimwood et al
as 2:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Paul Grimwood, Ben Van Beurden and James Dimon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Tillerson et al
as 2:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Rex W Tillerson, Tim Cook and Warren Buffett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
