Cases 21 - 30 of 35
DIXON v. ETHICON, NC et al
as 3:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA M. DIXON and DENNIS W. DIXON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTEN v. ZYCZYNSKI et al
as 2:2016cv01747
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA PATTEN
Defendant:
HALINA M. ZYCZYNSKI , UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS , WOMEN'S CENTER FOR BLADDER AND PELVIC HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STEIN et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01119
Plaintiff:
DALE STEIN and MARLENE STEIN
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00431
Plaintiff:
LORI BUTLER and DENNIS BUTLER
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC., C.R. BARD, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOOVER et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01013
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY D. HOOVER and NANCY HOOVER
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY INC. , SYNTHES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON
as 2:2015cv00337
Plaintiff:
ROGER L. BRADY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DILTS v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
SUSIE C. DILTS
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY SYNTHES JOINT RECONSTRUCTION , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON
as 2:2013cv01816
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE ROSE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEAKLAND v. COVIDIEN, INC et al
as 2:2013cv00997
Plaintiff:
SALLY WEAKLAND
Defendant:
COVIDIEN, INC, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
