Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Shawn July v. Stephen D'Ilio, et al
as 23-3079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN JULY
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN D'ILIO, Administrator
Defendant:
J. HINTZ, Sergeant of Department of Corrections, D. SMITH, KENNETH NELSON, Ex-Associate Administrator and others
JACKSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2022cv01630
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON, ANTHONY CASALE, DANO TOKLEY and others
Defendant:
PHILIP D. MURPHY, MARCUS O. HICKS, VICTORIA L. KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANBACK v. WISLER et al
as 3:2021cv19847
Plaintiff:
ABDUL M. STANBACK
Defendant:
BARRY A. WISLER, BORG FATHOM, DAVE RICHARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. GRAMP
as 1:2021cv13140
Petitioner:
PHILLIP A. DIXON
Respondent:
JONATHAN GRAMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOUGLAS v. GRAMPS
as 3:2021cv12989
Petitioner:
LAMONT O'SHEA DOUGLAS
Respondent:
JONATHAN GRAMPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GOMEZ v. GRAMP et al
as 2:2021cv11019
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JONATHAN GRAMP
Petitioner:
GERARDO GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOUGLAS v. GRAMPS
as 3:2021cv10854
Petitioner:
LAMONT O. DOUGLAS and LAMONT O'SHEA DOUGLAS
Respondent:
JONATHAN GRAMPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FOWLKES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2021cv07734
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JONATHAN GRAMP
Petitioner:
BRIAN FOWLKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PALLIPURATH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv04567
Defendant:
HAVIS INC., DR. COFFMAN, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M PALLIPURATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPPARD v. GRAMP et al
as 1:2021cv02631
Petitioner:
CHARLES SHEPPARD
Respondent:
JONATHAN GRAMP and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
