Cases 1 - 10 of 18
John Konop v. El-Batrawi et al
as 2:2021cv00998
Defendant:
Douglas M. Mox, Ramy El-Batrawi, kevin pickard and others
Plaintiff:
John Konop
Palmer v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 20-3989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Luis Pellot-Chandler, Deasahni Bernard, Derrick Palmer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Amazon.com Services, LLC and Amazon.com, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Catherine Troisi, Alex Reinert, Alan Morrison and others
ROSEN v. TRIEBENBACHER
as 3:2020cv15175
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ROSEN
Defendant:
George Treibenbacher and GEORGE TRIEBENBACHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Konop v. El-Batrawi et al
as 1:2020cv01379
Defendant:
Douglas M. Mox, Ramy El-Batrawi, Kevin Pickard and others
Nominal Defendant:
YayYo, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Konop
William Koch v. YayYo, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv08591
Defendant:
Ramy El-Batrawi, Jonathan Rosen, YayYo, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Koch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re YayYo, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 2:2020cv08235
Defendant:
Ramy El-Batrawi, Aegis Capital Corp., YayYo, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Hamlin
Consolidated Plaintiff:
William Koch
Petitioner:
Bernard Bednarz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Ivan Rung v. YayYo, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv08017
Defendant:
Ramy El-Batrawi, Does 1-25 inclusive, AEGIS Capital Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Rung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ivan Rung v. YayYo, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv08019
Defendant:
Ramy El-Batrawi, YayYo, Inc., Jeffrey J. Guzy and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Rung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Vanbecelaere v. YayYo, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv07997
Defendant:
Richard Rappaport, YayYo, Inc., Kevin Pickard and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Vanbecelaere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deptula v. Rosen et al
as 1:2020cv02371
Defendant:
JONATHAN ROSEN and CERAMICA DE ESPANA
Plaintiff:
KELCEY DEPTULA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
